<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung and Numonyx working to develop market specs for Phase Chance Memory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sammyhub.com/2009/06/25/samsung-and-numonyx-working-to-develop-market-specs-for-phase-chance-memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sammyhub.com/2009/06/25/samsung-and-numonyx-working-to-develop-market-specs-for-phase-chance-memory/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ECD Fan</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2009/06/25/samsung-and-numonyx-working-to-develop-market-specs-for-phase-chance-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>ECD Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=2049#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>Paul:  Samsung (actually, just a small team within Samsung) already hurt their credibility.

Just read here:

http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20070226/128173/

They fed this story to the Japanese press in February of 2007, promising &quot;Volume production set for 1H of 2008 to meet &quot;rather strong demands.&quot;

Never happened. As in every techno-Ponzi, the release date is always in the plausible future.

Samsung&#039;s most recent attempt to deceive was in late May this year:

http://www.koreaittimes.com/story/3584/samsung-discloses-perfect-ram-prototype

&quot;PRAM will be released to the market in June.&quot;

In five days that attempt will be proven a lie again.

More on all this read here:

http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-to-spot-fake-samsung-and-pram.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul:  Samsung (actually, just a small team within Samsung) already hurt their credibility.</p>
<p>Just read here:</p>
<p><a href="http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20070226/128173/" rel="nofollow">http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20070226/128173/</a></p>
<p>They fed this story to the Japanese press in February of 2007, promising &#8220;Volume production set for 1H of 2008 to meet &#8220;rather strong demands.&#8221;</p>
<p>Never happened. As in every techno-Ponzi, the release date is always in the plausible future.</p>
<p>Samsung&#8217;s most recent attempt to deceive was in late May this year:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.koreaittimes.com/story/3584/samsung-discloses-perfect-ram-prototype" rel="nofollow">http://www.koreaittimes.com/story/3584/samsung-discloses-perfect-ram-prototype</a></p>
<p>&#8220;PRAM will be released to the market in June.&#8221;</p>
<p>In five days that attempt will be proven a lie again.</p>
<p>More on all this read here:</p>
<p><a href="http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-to-spot-fake-samsung-and-pram.html" rel="nofollow">http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-to-spot-fake-samsung-and-pram.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2009/06/25/samsung-and-numonyx-working-to-develop-market-specs-for-phase-chance-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=2049#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>@ECD Fan: I don&#039;t think Samsung would risk its image and goodwill if this was a vaporware. In fact, most the industry stalwarts are optimistic about this.

http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218101166</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ECD Fan: I don&#8217;t think Samsung would risk its image and goodwill if this was a vaporware. In fact, most the industry stalwarts are optimistic about this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218101166" rel="nofollow">http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218101166</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECD Fan</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2009/06/25/samsung-and-numonyx-working-to-develop-market-specs-for-phase-chance-memory/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>ECD Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=2049#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>You are mistaken.  PCM is not a &quot;non-volatile memory that boasts fast read and write speeds, effectively combining the advantages of RAM, NOR and NAND.&quot;  Not at all.  PCM is techno-Ponzi.  Read all about it here:

http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/david-manners-semiconductor-blog/2009/02/is-phase-change-a-techno-ponzi.html

Neither Numonyx nor Samsung have any PCM product to show.  It is all vaporware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are mistaken.  PCM is not a &#8220;non-volatile memory that boasts fast read and write speeds, effectively combining the advantages of RAM, NOR and NAND.&#8221;  Not at all.  PCM is techno-Ponzi.  Read all about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/david-manners-semiconductor-blog/2009/02/is-phase-change-a-techno-ponzi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/david-manners-semiconductor-blog/2009/02/is-phase-change-a-techno-ponzi.html</a></p>
<p>Neither Numonyx nor Samsung have any PCM product to show.  It is all vaporware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 395/399 objects using disk: basic

Served from: sammyhub.com @ 2012-02-13 16:46:19 -->
