<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So what is Vita OS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Vita, posible nombre europeo de Bada</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/comment-page-1/#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Vita, posible nombre europeo de Bada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=5494#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>[...] Vita podr&#237;a ser el nombre comercial de Bada en Europa. Según se comenta en Samsung Hub, una empresa alemana tendr&#237;a ya registrado el nombre &#8220;bada&#8221; en la Unión [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vita podr&iacute;a ser el nombre comercial de Bada en Europa. Según se comenta en Samsung Hub, una empresa alemana tendr&iacute;a ya registrado el nombre &#8220;bada&#8221; en la Unión [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Schoene</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/comment-page-1/#comment-2396</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Schoene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=5494#comment-2396</guid>
		<description>@Karlheinz

youre right.wouldnt make any sense to rename it to Vita.made a small research and as per law the german party could file a dispute against their EU and german bada trademark due the similarity of both brands.
if they do it would force samsung to stop using the brand respectivly inside of germany till the issue is solved.maybe in front of court or outside with an agreement......maybe the german guys havent seen it yet so there wont be any problem ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karlheinz</p>
<p>youre right.wouldnt make any sense to rename it to Vita.made a small research and as per law the german party could file a dispute against their EU and german bada trademark due the similarity of both brands.<br />
if they do it would force samsung to stop using the brand respectivly inside of germany till the issue is solved.maybe in front of court or outside with an agreement&#8230;&#8230;maybe the german guys havent seen it yet so there wont be any problem <img src='http://sammyhub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karlheinz</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/comment-page-1/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>Karlheinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=5494#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>That looks interesting but I guess that Samsung will hold on to BADA after all their publishing on their homepage (http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobiltelefone/type.aspx) which clearly shows the BADA logo.

In case of a copyright issue this could be kind of problematic but I think Samsung will stick to it after the launch of their new platform (http://www.bada.com/) in December with all those 2.7M$ in prices to claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks interesting but I guess that Samsung will hold on to BADA after all their publishing on their homepage (<a href="http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobiltelefone/type.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://samsung.de/de/Privatkunden/Mobil/Mobiltelefone/type.aspx</a>) which clearly shows the BADA logo.</p>
<p>In case of a copyright issue this could be kind of problematic but I think Samsung will stick to it after the launch of their new platform (<a href="http://www.bada.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bada.com/</a>) in December with all those 2.7M$ in prices to claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Schoene</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/comment-page-1/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Schoene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=5494#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>just found the correspondig link ;)

http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/register/1893024/304709166/DE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just found the correspondig link <img src='http://sammyhub.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/register/1893024/304709166/DE" rel="nofollow">http://register.dpma.de/DPMAregister/marke/register/1893024/304709166/DE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung files for &#8220;Vita OS&#8221; trademark &#8211; another mobile OS? &#187; Unwired View</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/comment-page-1/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung files for &#8220;Vita OS&#8221; trademark &#8211; another mobile OS? &#187; Unwired View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=5494#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>[...] in case the Bada naming would somehow fail. How could it fail? Well, someone posted a comment at SamsungHub, saying that this may have “something to do with a trademark problem that could affect the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in case the Bada naming would somehow fail. How could it fail? Well, someone posted a comment at SamsungHub, saying that this may have “something to do with a trademark problem that could affect the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Schoene</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/01/21/so-what-is-vita-os/comment-page-1/#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Schoene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=5494#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Hi there,have seen the vita trademark also.i think it has something to do with a trademark problem that could affect their europe trademark of bada.there is a guy in germany that could block their german and eu registration of samsungs bada trademark cause he is using an almost identical looking trademark in the same category.have looked the company website up it´s www.av-solutions.info maybe samsung wants to have a back door if soemthing goes wrong.cheers Sven</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,have seen the vita trademark also.i think it has something to do with a trademark problem that could affect their europe trademark of bada.there is a guy in germany that could block their german and eu registration of samsungs bada trademark cause he is using an almost identical looking trademark in the same category.have looked the company website up it´s <a href="http://www.av-solutions.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.av-solutions.info</a> maybe samsung wants to have a back door if soemthing goes wrong.cheers Sven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 463/467 objects using disk: basic

Served from: sammyhub.com @ 2012-02-13 10:37:23 -->
