<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sammy Hub &#187; comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sammyhub.com/tag/comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sammyhub.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:19:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Quick comparison: Samsung Epic &amp; HTC Evo</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2010/06/29/quick-comparison-samsung-epic-htc-evo/</link>
		<comments>http://sammyhub.com/2010/06/29/quick-comparison-samsung-epic-htc-evo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kunal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=7399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Samsung today introduced Epic, its first 4G device that will run on Sprint and since Sprint has another power packed 4G device, HTC Evo in its arsenal, it would make an interesting comparison when you compare it spec-to-spec. Evo retails for $199 and though the Epic&#8217;s price is not yet confirmed, we expect to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://sammyhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/epic-4g.jpg" alt="Samsung Epic" /></center><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>Samsung today introduced Epic, its first 4G device that will run on Sprint and since Sprint has another power packed 4G device, HTC Evo in its arsenal, it would make an interesting comparison when you compare it spec-to-spec.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://sammyhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/epic-evo-specs.png" alt="epic-evo-specs" title="epic-evo-specs" width="500" height="671" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7402" /></center></p>
<p>Evo retails for $199 and though the Epic&#8217;s price is not yet confirmed, we expect to be in the same range.</p>
<p>Think we missed out something? Let us know in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sammyhub.com/2010/06/29/quick-comparison-samsung-epic-htc-evo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick comparison: Samsung S9110 &amp; LG GD910</title>
		<link>http://sammyhub.com/2009/07/23/quick-comparison-samsung-s9110-lg-gd910/</link>
		<comments>http://sammyhub.com/2009/07/23/quick-comparison-samsung-s9110-lg-gd910/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kunal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD910]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S9110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samsunghub.com/?p=2554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; There’s no doubt that Samsung launched its S9110 to outdo LG’s GD910. But will this entry spoil LG&#8217;s party? We take a quick look by comparing each of its specifications and give you our say as to which one you should go for. Network: S9110 – GSM 900 / 1800 GD910 – GSM 850 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://sammyhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/s9110-gd910.jpg" alt="s9110-gd910" title="s9110-gd910" width="462" height="281" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2556" /></center><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>There’s no doubt that Samsung launched its <a href="http://samsunghub.com/tag/S9110" target="_blank">S9110</a> to outdo LG’s GD910. But will this entry spoil LG&#8217;s party?  We take a quick look by comparing each of its specifications and give you our say as to which one you should go for.</p>
<p><strong>Network:<br />
</strong>S9110 – GSM 900 / 1800<br />
GD910 – GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900; HSDPA – 2100<br />
Result: GD910 has an upper hand here with a global GSM coverage and support for 3G.</p>
<p><strong>Dimensions and Weight:<br />
</strong>S9110 – 57.5 x 41.1 x 11.98 mm; 91g<br />
GD910 – 61 x 39 x 13.9 mm; 84g<br />
Result: 2mm is in no way thick and is hardly noticeable but you know, if slimness is what you crave for, S9110 is the way to go. Oh and as you can see, it’s a bit heavier too.</p>
<p><strong>Display:<br />
</strong>S9110 – 1.76-inch 256K colors capacitive touchscreen (176&#215;220)<br />
GD910 – 1.43-inch 256K colors capacitive touchscreen (176&#215;220)<br />
Result: Pretty much the same but a bigger screen like on S9110 is always welcome.</p>
<p><strong>Camera:<br />
</strong>S9110 – No<br />
GD910 – Yes, CIF resolution<br />
Result: S9110 does not have a camera and even a camera supporting CIF resolution in GD910 is a big plus. To top it, it can be used to carry out video calls.</p>
<p><strong>Memory:<br />
</strong>S9110 – 40MB internal<br />
GD910 – <del datetime="2009-07-24T09:57:47+00:00">No mention</del> 2GB internal [via <a href="http://www.intomobile.com" target="_blank">Intomobile</a>]<br />
Result: LG&#8217;s GD910 is a clear winner over here. This could be an area of concern for Samsung. 2GB seems more than enough to store songs, pictures but 40MB on S9110&#8230;forget it!</p>
<p><strong>Bluetooth:<br />
</strong>S9110 – v2.1 with A2DP<br />
GD910 – v2.0 with A2DP<br />
Result: S9110 one ups GD910 on the Bluetooth front. v2.1 gives advantages like simple pairing, enhanced security and power efficiency.</p>
<p><strong>Other features:<br />
</strong>S9110 – E-mail (Outlook Sync), Voice recognition, Voice memo, MP3 player, Organizer, T9<br />
GD910 – Waterproof, Voice recognition, Text to Speech (TTS), MP3 Player, Organizer, T9<br />
Result: Both the devices offer on par features but S9110 gives e-mail support while GD910 trades in for its waterproof capability and TTS.</p>
<p><strong>Battery:<br />
</strong>S9110 – Li-ion 630mAh, no word on expected talk and standby time<br />
GD910 – Li-ion, up to 2 hours of talk time and 247 hours of standby time<br />
Result: We can’t really compare on this front since the data is inadequate but we expect Samsung’s watchphone to be in the same range.</p>
<p><strong>Price:<br />
</strong>S9110 – Around $640<br />
GD910 – Around $1290 (with selected plans or $1434)<br />
Result: Need we say more? <del datetime="2009-08-07T12:09:49+00:00">If the rumored price turns out to be true for GD910, Samsung will easily be beat LG hands down. </del></p>
<p>Summing it up, we think price is going to be a crucial factor. Even though GD910 is superior in some areas, shelling out <del datetime="2009-08-07T12:09:49+00:00">1000</del> more than 600 bucks doesn&#8217;t justify it.</p>
<p>Thought we missed out anything? Do let us know in the comments.</p>
<p>Specifications sourced from <a href="http://www.gsmarena.com" target="_blank">GSMArena</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sammyhub.com/2009/07/23/quick-comparison-samsung-s9110-lg-gd910/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/14 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 565/591 objects using disk: basic

Served from: sammyhub.com @ 2012-02-13 09:24:05 -->
